Where there's a place for everything (ok, maybe not EVERYTHING, but close to everything at least).

Tech & World News, Computer Stuff, Martial Arts, Sports, Music, etc. in one single place.

Welcome to the discussion hall in Expert Technology Storehouse! The name says it all. We are a storehouse storing everything from computer stuff and knowledge (expert, BTW...), to tech & world news, martial arts, sports, music...and someday useful software as well. Want to join? We welcome new members, especially experts at stuff!

Latest topics

» Compatibility Sword
Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:17 pm by Coolname007

» Adcted mu online
Mon May 09, 2011 1:15 am by Guest

» The Introduction Thread
Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:36 pm by Coolname007

» Count to one million!
Sat Mar 19, 2011 12:22 pm by Coolname007

» Funny Guy!
Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:25 pm by Coolname007

» China says police killed 12 in Urumqi rioting
Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:14 pm by fvwizard

» Arieth Mu Online
Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:46 pm by Coolname007

» MAW - Make A Website
Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:12 am by Coolname007

» AVACS LIVE CHAT free chat software for mobiles and computer
Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:19 pm by Coolname007


    Vista MBR vs XP MBR

    Share
    avatar
    Coolname007
    ETS Director
    ETS Director

    Posts : 629
    Join date : 2009-07-15
    Location : Half-way between nowhere and somewhere

    Vista MBR vs XP MBR

    Post by Coolname007 on Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:57 pm

    Just thought I'd post a useful link concerning differences in the XP and Vista MBRs, and whether the XP version can load a Vista boot sector (which searches for bootmgr) or not:

    http://www.vistax64.com/vista-general/134441-vista-mbr-vs-xp-mbr.html

    CZ wrote:
    Summary of results of running Win98 SE's fdisk /mbr on a Vista computer.
    (note that the computer multi-boots between two Vista installs, one with SP1
    and the other w/o SP1, and several installs of XP)

    1) Did the disk signature change?
    Yes, and Vista and XP automatically changed the partition signatures to
    reflect the change (per a registry review).

    2) Did vista load and run in the normal manner with the Win98 SE MBR and the
    new disk signature?
    For the Vista install w/o SP1: yes, it had zero problems.
    For the Vista install with SP1: no. It would only boot into a temporary
    profile, using either of two admin user accts. The drive enumeration system
    was changed so that the Vista SP1 vol instead of being C: (the pre-test
    drive letter), the vol now boots as I:. Note that both Vista vols were
    installed via a DVD boot using the same TechNet DVD, so, the drive
    enumeration system was not changed for the Vista vol that did not have SP1.

    3) Manually changing the disk signature in sector 0 (the MBR) back to the
    pre-test signature did not solve the problem with the Vista SP1 vol.


    Notes
    For non-Vista booting, drive C: is XP Home, meaning that Home was installed
    before the other op system installs.

    The computer has two hard disks, one has a single primary partition and an
    extended partition, the other only has an extended partition (no primary).


    _________________
    ETS:
    Where tech meets traditional, and ideas merge to form one single entity.

    Help ETS by joining today, and contributing content! Your help is very much appreciated.

    Jake Johnson - Site Admin/Owner

    Founder of Expert Technology Storehouse.

      Current date/time is Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:10 am